In
this blog, I will be summarizing and analyzing three different texts from the
“Appendix D 6-9: “The Italian Question, Reviews of Poems before Congress”
section of Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s Selected
Poems. These texts include “Poems
before Congress” by Henry Forhergill Chorley, “Mrs. Browning’s New Poems,
The Atlas”, and “Poetic Aberrations by
William Edmondstoune Aytoun. These three blogs talk about women and some talk
about EBB and others talk about women of the time.
Summary
The
three of these articles were kind of confusing to follow along, but each
article I read seemed to be a little different. In the first review I read, “Poems before Congress” Chorley talks
about EBB and her writing. “She is more political than poetical, expressing her
blind faith in Napoleon the Third as the hope of Italy, and flinging out a
malediction against England” (351). I do agree that EBB is more of a political
writer, but I don’t see anything wrong with that because women at this time
didn’t like to know about politics let alone create poems about political
issues. This review also says “…One who has written, in her time, better than
the best of English poetesses” (352). I don’t think that EBB is one of the best
English poetesses and I think that because I like Robert Browning’s poetry
better. Elizabeth is still a very great poet, I just don’t “click” with her
poems. In the next review, Mrs. Browning’s new poems, they also talk about how
great of a poet EBB is! “a writer who unites the strength of a man’s intellect
to the largeness of a woman’s heart” (353). He also talks about one of her
other poems “A Curse for a Nation” and
in this poem, Elizabeth talks about cursing her own country. At the time, this
wasn’t right for people to do, not even a little bit. “A curse from the depths
of womanhood, its very salt, and bitter, and good” (353). Then, in the last
review that I read by William Aytoun he talks about women in general, not so
much about EBB. He states that women shouldn’t interfere with politics. He says
that “we love the fair sex too well, to desire that they should be withdrawn
from their own sphere, which is that of adorning the domestic circle, and
tempering by their gentleness the asperities of our ruder nature…” (354). I don’t
think it’s “bad” that women can be involved in politics, I mean maybe it was
like this at the time, but anyone who wanted to be involved could be. Like I mentioned
above, these reviews were pretty hard to understand, so hopefully I got the
basic information out.
Analysis
Even
though I was a little confused on the reviews, I still liked reading them. I
just find it very interesting that women were looked down if they were into
politics, or even if they wrote about politics in their poems. Women are strong
and independent and now that women have a say it shouldn’t matter if they want
to talk about politics in their poetry or not. And I do agree that EBB is a
great poet, but I don’t think she is the best female poet of this time.